This topic really tickled me because both Johnson and Stevens article were convicing. johnson claimed that intelligence is all through TV and that it takes alot of brain work to keep up with a show. Steven explained that even in the old days we had better since then to watch tv and get some knowlede. She went on saying that Johnson article had made no sense. She went on talking bout "social relationships" saying that it represent foil. I was a little confused by that statement but I later relized that she argues that even though tv so serious its still hilarious. Overall both articles gave good point like narrative theads and nd paying attention to the plots. Basically Steven article was to argue that tv is for entertainment and fun and not just to "manage resources".If I can choose a side I would chove Steven's because tv isn't that serious.